As we consider the reality of surpassing 400 million Americans by 2030, a global recession that continues to linger and a dramatic change in social lifestyle, the schematics of dating have taken on a new framework. Competition is higher and the quality of candidates has shrunken to some questionable lows. Mobile communication and Web 2.0 have reduced the percentage of time spent in actual intimate face to face settings and more and more of us are becoming desensitized to human contact.
What an awakening!
Relationship headhunters have found an opening and now is their time to find a lucrative hole as wandering souls search desperately for a connection.
When professionals, successful adults or individuals feeling the social scene has gotten them down hire a relationship agency, they are provided with a number of resources:
1.) Coaching and training on how to effectively date. How to read body language. Proper posture. How to maintain a strong dining conversation and what is the right and wrong thing to say when posed with traditional date questions.
2.) Match you up with potential mates based on a series of personality and lifestyle matches.
3.) Selecting locations that are most conducive of a comfortable conversation setting.
4.) Conduct initial background and credit checks on all potential clients.
5.) Organize meet and greet events to provide a comfortable social environment for clients.
6.) Follow up with metrics and success/failure stories on past relationships.
Now with a successfully formula of research, process, implementation and reporting, why aren’t talent acquisition teams utilizing a similar philosophy?
First, why don’t companies do background checks during the initial interview and not wait until the offer is extended? Are there legal reasons, cost issues or just an unwillingness to take a proactive stance.
Do enough companies really follow up with new associates and solicit real feedback or is it based on a generic questionaire that isn’t even tailored to the role, location, business unit or responsibilities?
Who follows the path of this person? Is it the strategic sourcer, the recruiter, the hiring manager, the unit supervisor or the administrative assistant that reports the metrics???
Is the match making one-sided? We know the company and the culture as talent acquisition specialists but do we really know the candidates and whether they “fit” the culture?
They have the right technical skills. True
They have the right cultural background. True
They have industry experience. True
They have the right leadership skills? True
But, are they good long term marriage potential or will we see a divorce in the near future?
It is time we look at each of our processes and put yourself on the other side.
As the client, is my relationship consultant there from start to finish?
Are they really understanding me and my needs?
Can I fall in love with the company or is this a short term romance?
I think all of us in talent acquisition can learn something from the match making world.